with respect to vision, what exactly is constant in perceptual constancy?

Abstruse

It is a familiar feel to perceive a material object as maintaining a stable shape even though it projects differently shaped images on our retina as we movement with respect to it, or every bit maintaining a stable color throughout changes in the mode the object is illuminated. We also perceive sounds every bit maintaining abiding timbre and loudness when the context and the spatial relations between us and the sound source alter over time. But where does this perceptual invariance 'come from'? What is it about our perceptual systems that makes them able to 'transform' incoming unstable and fluctuating sensory inputs into generally stable and coherent conscious experiences? And what exactly exercise we experience every bit invariant in cases like those described above? There are two main approaches to the Problem of Perceptual Invariance: the Local-Inferential approach and the Global-Structural approach. Although both approaches include an account of the sub-personal perceptual mechanisms 'stabilizing' variant and invariant components in incoming sensory stimulation and a proposal regarding the phenomenology of perceptual invariance, in this newspaper I argue that the latter provides a ameliorate solution to the problem overall.

Notes

1. What I called the problem of perceptual invariance should exist distinguished from the more normally discussed 'problem of Perception' (cfr. Crane & French, 2017), even though some philosophers, nigh famously A. D. Smith (2002) and Alva Noë (2004, 2012), tried to combine them and provide a unified solution. As I see information technology, the problem of perceptual invariance is more than circumscribed than the problem of perception. While the latter concerns the nature of the human relationship between perceptual feel and the mind-independent world and, relatedly, the nature of perceptual states (due east.g. relational or representational), the former has to do with only one specific aspect of perceptual feel: perceptual invariance. Additionally, while the trouble of perception does not involve reference to the mechanisms underlying perceptual feel, the problem of perceptual invariance concerns both the level of perceptual phenomenology and the level of mechanisms. The mechanisms in question are ordinarily known equally 'perceptual constancies'.

2. Although I am aware that some theories of perception do not consider what happens at the level of perceptual systems to be relevant for their explanatory goals, I will non discuss such views hither.

3. See Buccella & Chemero (unpublished) for more than on this.

4. Of form, on the assumption that accounting for more cases in a unified manner is itself a theoretical virtue.

5. I major commitment of this type of views is that, because of the ambiguity of proximal stimuli, perception of how things are independently of us must depend on a capacity to 'construct' a representation of the object and its properties which can be kept 'fixed' throughout changes in contextual and perceiver-dependent elements over time. Too, it should be acknowledged that there are slight differences among individual views within the traditional framework. For instance, Stone (1975, 1977) following Helmholtz and his 'unconscious inference' account of how the visual organization transforms proximal subjective sensations into distal object representations, holds that proximal stimuli should be considered an 'early phase' of perceptual processing. According to Rock, the office of proximal stimulation is to provide one of the two 'premises' of an unconscious inference-like procedure which has the (possibly accurate) attribution of a specific property to an object as its 'conclusion', the other premise normally being an abstract rule or principle (itself 'located' somewhere in the brain) which 'tells' the visual system how to interpret the proximal stimulus. Equally Gilchrist (2012) notices, the thought that perception (and perceptual constancy) should be understood every bit a process consisting in two separate stages (i.due east. sensory stimulation and rule-based estimation) was very much opposed by the Gestalt psychologists (Koffka, 1935; Kohler, 1947). All the same, criticisms to this thought have come from within the tradition, too. For instance, Burge (2010) rejects the existence of (explicitly or implicitly) represented 'inferential rules' in the encephalon according to which we interpret proximal stimuli.

6. Pagano and Cabe (2003) showed that subjects can judge the length of a hand-held rod past simply waving it around and relying on feedback from their arm muscles and tendons. Their proposition is that the proprioceptive and kinaesthetic systems are direct tracking a relational feature of the arm-rod system, namely its moment of inertia, i.east. an object'due south resistance to rotation along ane dimension.

7. Instead of considering incorrect weight judgments in the illusion as the result of an erroneous mental ciphering, they showed how weight judgments of objects of equal size and weight varied co-ordinate to the objects' different distribution of such weight.

8. In a more conciliatory spirit, Davies (2016) argues that color matching experiments back up a pluralist view, where color constancy is sometimes traditional, and sometimes relational. I volition non hash out Davies's view in this paper, merely my main reason to resist pluralism is that, when we wait at other constancies beyond color, the traditional view encounters difficulties (as the next section argues). This fact, together with a desire to provide a unified account of all the constancies across sense modalities, makes me inclined to put all my eggs in the relational handbasket. It should also be noted that in a more contempo paper, Davies defends a new theory of colour vision which has been gaining popularity in both science and philosophy. Roughly, this theory claims that representation of color relations, understood in detail every bit chromatic contrast backdrop (in the course of a 'holistic' iconic representation of edges separating colored surfaces) is more than archaic than representation of monadic color backdrop (Davies, 2020). This view is supported by several studies involving patients diagnosed with cognitive achromatopsia, a condition that makes subjects visual experience completely achromatic. Despite their inability to see monadic colors, some achromatopsic patients are nonetheless apparently able to visually perceive local contrasts and discriminate amidst different appearances of edges (Kentridge, Heywood et al., 2004a; Kentridge, Cole et al., 2004b). If this is right, then nosotros might have a further reason to privilege a relational view of color continuance based on the very functioning of color vision.

9. When presenting the experiment'southward results, Foster warns that "it is unlikely that either will wait like a match to the reader considering they are not seen in the experimental conditions of controlled illumination." (2003, p. 440).

10. For example, Maloney and colleagues (Maloney, 1986, 2003; Maloney and Wandell 1986) propose a method to solve the inverse problem of colour constancy which exploits the fact that there are more combinations of receptors on the retina than at that place are possible surface reflection profiles, while others (e.g. Golz and MacLeod 2002; Brainard et al., 2006; Brainard and Freeman 1997) entreatment to college-club scene statistics and Bayesian models.

11. E.k. Hilbert, (1987), Byrne & Hilbert (2003), Tye (2000).

12. I do not consider the authors discussed in this section as endorsing GS or even being involved in the debate most invariance equally I set it up. Rather, I see the arguments discussed in this section more as external allies of GS, as they undermine what I accept to be the strongest source of support for LI.

13. Past "the same blouse" here I mean "a qualitatively identical blouse".

14. For more psychological studies supporting the merits that the visual organisation has a 'preference' for structure as opposed to invariant 3D shape representation, see Guan and Firestone (2019) and Lowet et al. (2018).

15. For a contempo word of the topic in the context of a philosophical theory of perception, meet Schellenberg (2018, 2019).

References

• Amano, K., Foster, D. H., & Nascimento, Due south. One thousand. C. (2005). Minimalist surface-colour matching. Perception, 34(8), 1009–1013. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5185

  Article  Google Scholar

• Amano, 1000., Foster, D. H., & Nascimento, S. M. C. (2006). Colour continuance in natural scenes with and without an explicit illuminant cue. Visual Neuroscience, 23, 351–356.

  Google Scholar

• Amazeen, East. L., & Turvey, Yard. T. (1996). Weight perception and the haptic size–weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.1.213

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Arend, L., & Reeves, A. (1986). Simultaneous color constancy. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3(10), 1743–1751.

  Google Scholar

• Balasubramaniam, R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2000). Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait & Posture, 11(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/x.1016/S0966-6362(99)00051-X

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Bizley, J. K., & Cohen, Y. Due east. (2013). The what, where, and how of auditory-object perception. Nature reviews Neuroscience, 14, 693–707.

  Google Scholar

• Blackmore, Due south. (2002). There is no stream of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, 17–28.

  Google Scholar

• Boundy-Singer, Z. Yard., Saal, H. P., & Bensmaia, South. J. (2017). Speed invariance of tactile texture perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 118(4), 2371–2377. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00161.2017

  Article  Google Scholar

• Brainard, D. H. (1998). Color constancy in the nearly natural epitome 2. Achromatic loci. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15(ii), 307–325.

  Google Scholar

• Brainard, D., & Freeman, Due west. T. (1997). Bayesian color continuance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 14(7), 1393–1411. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.fourteen.001393.

  Article  Google Scholar

• Brainard, D., Longere, P., Delahunt, P., Freeman, W., Kraft, J., & Xiao, B. (2006). Bayesian model of human colour continuance. Journal of Vision, half-dozen, 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1167/6.xi.x.

  Article  Google Scholar

• Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene assay: the perceptual arrangement of sound. MIT Printing.

  Google Scholar

• Brown, R. (2003). Backgrounds and illuminants: the yin and yang of color constancy. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.), Color perception – mind and the concrete globe (pp. 247–272). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. A. (1996). Visual perception, physiology, psychology, and ecology. Taylor and Francis.

  Google Scholar

• Burge, T. (2010). Origins of objectivity. Oxford Academy Press.

  Google Scholar

• Byrne, A., & Hilbert, D. R. (2003). Color realism and color scientific discipline. Behavioral and Encephalon Sciences, 26, 3–64.

  Google Scholar

• Carello, C., & Turvey, K. T. (2004). Physics and Psychology of the Muscle Sense. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/x.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01301007.x.

• Charpentier, A. (1891). Analyse experimentale de quelques elements de la sensation de poids. Archives Physiologiques Normales and Pathologiques, 18, 79–87.

  Google Scholar

• Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive scientific discipline. MIT Press.

  Google Scholar

• Chirimuuta, M. (2008). Reflectance realism and color continuance: what would count as scientific evidence for Hilbert'south ontology of colour? Australasian Periodical of Philosophy, 86(4), 563–582.

  Google Scholar

• Chirimuuta, Chiliad. (2015). Outside Color. MIT Press.

  Google Scholar

• Cicerone, C. M., Hoffman, D. D., Gowdy, P., & Kim, J. (1995). The perception of color from motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 761–777.

  Google Scholar

• Clark, A. (2012). Dreaming the whole true cat: generative models, predictive processing, and the enactivist conception of perceptual experience. Mind, 121(483), 753–771.

  Google Scholar

• Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action, and the embodied heed. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Cohen, J. (2015). Perceptual representation, veridicality, and the interface theory of perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1512–1518.

  Google Scholar

• Comte, Auguste. (1830). Cours de philosophie positive (Vol. 1). Bacheleier, Libraire pour les Mathématiques.

  Google Scholar

• Crane, T., French, C. (2017). The Problem of Perception,The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/athenaeum/spr2017/entries/perception-problem/>.

• Darici, O., Temeltas, H., & Kuo, A. D. (2020). Anticipatory command of momentum for bipedal walking on uneven Terrain. Scientific Reports, 10(ane), 540. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57156-6.

  Article  Google Scholar

• Davies, W. (2016). Color constancy, illumination, and matching. Philosophy of Science, 83, 540–562.

  Google Scholar

• Davies, Due west. (2020). Colour relations in form. Philosophy and Phenomenological Enquiry, 00, 1–21. https://doi.org/ten.1111/phpr.12679

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc conceot in psychology. The Psychological Review, 3(iv), 357–370.

  Google Scholar

• Elliott, T. M., Hamilton, Fifty. S., & Theunissen, F. E. (2013). Audio-visual construction of the 5 perceptual dimensions of timbre in orchestral instrument tones. The Periodical of the Acoustical Gild of America, 133(i), 389–404.

  Google Scholar

• Fodor, J. A. (1984). Observation reconsidered. Philosophy of Science, 51(one), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6765.003.0014.

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Fodor, J. A. (1990). A theory of content and other essays. The MIT Press.

• Foster, D. H. (2003). Does colour constancy exist? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 439–443.

  Google Scholar

• Foster, D. H., & Nascimento, S. Thousand. C. (1994). Relational Colour Constancy from Invariant Cone-Excitation Ratios (Vol. 257).

• Gibson, James J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Houghton Mifflin.

  Google Scholar

• Gibson, James J. (1966). The senses considered ad perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.

  Google Scholar

• Gibson, James J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

  Google Scholar

• Gibson, J. J., & Crooks, L. E. (1938). A theoretical field-analysis of car-driving. The American Journal of Psychology, 51, 453–471. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416145

  Article  Google Scholar

• Gilchrist, A. (2012). Objective and subjective sides of perception. In K. Hatfield & Southward. Allred (Eds.), Visual feel – sensation, knowledge, and constancy (pp. 105–121). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Gładziejewski, P. (2016). Predictive coding and representationalism. Synthese, 193(2), 559–582.

  Google Scholar

• Golz, J., & MacLeod, D. I. A. (2002). Influence of scene statistics on colour constancy. Nature, 415(6872), 637–640.

  Google Scholar

• Granrud, C. E. (2009). Development of size constancy in children: a exam of the metacognitive theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(iii), 644–654. https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.three.644

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Granrud, C. E. (2012). Strategy utilize in size judgments. In G. Hatfield & Due south. Allred (Eds.), Visual experience – sensation, cognition, and constancy (pp. 13–34). Oxford Academy Press (OUP).

  Google Scholar

• Granrud, C. E., & Shmechel, T. Northward. (2006). Evolution of size continuance in children: a test of the proximal mode sensitivity hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 68, 1372–1381.

  Google Scholar

• Green, E. J. (2019). On the perception of structure. Noûs, 53(3), 564–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12207

  Article  Google Scholar

• Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature reviews Neuroscience, 5, 887–892.

  Google Scholar

• Guan, C., & Firestone, C. (2019). Seeing what's possible: disconnected visual parts are confused for their potential wholes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, i(999), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000658

  Article  Google Scholar

• Hatfield, G. (2009). On perceptual continuance. In G. Hatfield (Ed.), Perception and cognition: essays in the philosophy of psychology (pp. 178–211). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Hatfield, Thousand. (2012). Astounding and cognitive factors in spatial perception. In One thousand. Hatfield & Southward. Allred (Eds.), Visual experience – awareness, cognition, and continuance (pp. 35–62). Oxford University Printing.

  Google Scholar

• Heald, Southward. L. 1000., Van Hedger, S. C., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2017). Perceptual plasticity for auditory object recognition. Front end. Psychol, 8, 781.

  Google Scholar

• Hering, E. (1878). Grundzüge der Lehre vom Lichtsinn. Springer.

  Google Scholar

• Hilbert, D. R. (1987). Color and color perception: a study in anthropocentric realism. CSLI.

  Google Scholar

• Hochberg, J. (1988). Visual perception. In R. Atkinson (Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. Wiley.

  Google Scholar

• Hohwy, J. (2013). The predictive mind. Oxford Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Hutto, D., & Myin, Eastward. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Bones minds without content. MIT Printing.

• Isaac, A. (2017). Prospects for timbre physicalism. Philosophical Studies, 175, 503–529.

  Google Scholar

• James, W. (2007). The Principles of Psychology. Cosimo Classics.

• Jones, L. A. (2003). Perceptual constancy and the perceived magnitude of muscle forces. Experimental Encephalon Research, 151, 197–203.

  Google Scholar

• Kelly, S. D. (1999). What do we see when we do? In T. Baldwin (Ed.), Philosophical Topics, (Vol. 27, Issue two). Routledge

• Kentridge, R. West., Heywood, C. A., & Cowey, A. (2004a). Chromatic edges, surfaces and constancies in cerebral achromatopsia. Neuropsychologia, 42(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/ten.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.002

  Article  Google Scholar

• Kentridge, R. Due west., Cole, One thousand. 1000., & Heywood, C. A. B. T.-P. in B. R. (2004b). The primacy of chromatic edge processing in normal and cerebrally achromatopsic subjects. In The roots of visual sensation: a festschrift in honour of Alan Cowey (Vol. 144, pp. 161–169). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(03)14411-1.

• Khan, Due south., & Chang, R. (2013). Anatomy of the vestibular system: a review. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(3), 437–443.

  Google Scholar

• Kiefte, M., & Kluender, K. R. (2008). Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception. The Periodical of the Acoustical Guild of America, 123(1), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1121/i.2804951

  Article  Google Scholar

• Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. Harcourt, Caryatid & World.

  Google Scholar

• Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology. Liveright.

  Google Scholar

• Lee, D. Due north., & Lishman, J. R. (1975). Visual proprioceptive control of stance. Periodical of Human Motion Studies, 1(ii), 87–95.

  Google Scholar

• Lee, David North., & Reddish, P. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics. Nature, 293(5830), 293–294. https://doi.org/10.1038/293293a0

  Article  Google Scholar

• Lee, D. N. (2011). How movement is guided. Retrieved from http://www.pmarc.ed.ac.uk/ideas/pdf/HowMovtGuided100311.pdf

• Lowet, A. S., Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2018). Seeing construction: shape skeletons modulate perceived similarity. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 80(v), 1278–1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1457-8

  Article  Google Scholar

• Maloney, L. T. (1986). Evaluation of linear models of surface spectral reflectance with small-scale numbers of parameters. Periodical of the Optical Society of America A, three, 1673–1683.

  Google Scholar

• Maloney, L. (2003). Surface colour perception and ecology constraints. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.), Colour perception – listen and the physical world (pp. 279–300). Oxford Academy Press.

  Google Scholar

• Maloney, L. T., & Wandell, B. A. (1986). Colour constancy: a method for recovering surface spectral reflectance. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 3(ane), 29–33.

  Google Scholar

• Massion, J. (1994). Postural control system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4(half dozen), 877–887. https://doi.org/x.1016/0959-4388(94)90137-half-dozen.

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Matherne, Southward. (2017). Merleau-ponty on way as the cardinal to perceptual presence and constancy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 55(iv), 693–727. https://doi.org/ten.1353/hph.2017.0071

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Matthen, M., & Rescorla, Grand. (2015). Bayesian Perceptual Psychology. In M. Matthen (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception.

• Mausfeld, R. (2003). 'Colour' as part of the format of different perceptual primitives: the dual coding of color. In R. Mausfeld & D. Heyer (Eds.), Color perception: heed and physical world (pp. 381–430). Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1963). The structure of beliefs. Buoy Press.

  Google Scholar

• Merleau-Ponty, 1000. (1964). In J. M. Edie & W. Cobb (Eds.), The primacy of perception and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history and politics. Northwestern University Printing.

  Google Scholar

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2013). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.

  Google Scholar

• Metzger, W. (1930). Optische Untersuchungen am Ganzfeld. Psychologische Forschung, xiii(i), 6–29.

  Google Scholar

• Nascimento, Southward. G. C., de Almeida, V. M. N., Fiadeiro, P. T., & Foster, D. H. (2005). Issue of complexity on colour constancy with existent 3-dimensional scenes and objects. Perception, 34, 947–950.

  Google Scholar

• Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.

  Google Scholar

• Noë, A. (2012). Varieties of presence. Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Pagano, C. C., & Cabe, P. A. (2003). Constancy in dynamic touch: length perceived past dynamic touch is invariant over changes in media. Ecological Psychology, 15, i–17.

  Google Scholar

• Rescorla, G. (2015). Bayesian perceptual psychology. In 1000. Matthen (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of perception. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/x.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.010.

• Riley, Chiliad. A., Kuznetsov, N., & Bonnette, Due south. (2011). State-, parameter-, and graph-dynamics: constraints and the distillation of postural command systems. Scientific discipline & Motricité, 74, five–18. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2011117

  Article  Google Scholar

• Rock, I. (1975). Introduction to perception. Macmillan Publishing Co.

  Google Scholar

• Rock, I. (1977). In defense of unconscious inference. In West. Epstein (Ed.), Stability and constancy in visual perception (pp. 321–373). Wiley.

  Google Scholar

• Roden, D. (2010). Sonic fine art and the nature of sonic events. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 1(1), 141–156. https://doi.org/x.1007/s13164-009-0002-7.

  Commodity  Google Scholar

• Russell, B. (1912). The problems of philosophy. Oxford Academy Press (OUP).

  Google Scholar

• Schellenberg, Due south. (2018). The unity of perception: content, consciousness. Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Schellenberg, S. (2019). Accurateness conditions, functions, perceptual discrimination. Analysis, 79(four), 739–754. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz057

  Article  Google Scholar

• Schwitzgebel, E. (2008). The unreliability of naive introspection. The Philosophical Review, 117(ii), 245–273. https://doi.org/x.1215/00318108-2007-037

  Article  Google Scholar

• Schwitzgebel, E. (2012). Introspection, what? Introspection and Consciousness. https://doi.org/x.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0001

  Article  Google Scholar

• Shockley, Chiliad., Carello, C., & Turvey, M. T. (2004). Metamers in the haptic perception of heaviness and moveableness. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(5), 731–742.

  Google Scholar

• Siedenburg, Chiliad., & McAdams, S. (2017). Four distinctions for the auditory "wastebasket" of timbre1. In Frontiers in Psychology (Vol. 8). Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01747.

• Smith, A. D. (2002). The problem of perception. Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar

• Stilp, C. E., Alexander, J. M., Kiefte, M., & Kluender, Thousand. R. (2010). Auditory colour constancy: scale to reliable spectral properties across nonspeech context and targets. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72(2), 470–480.

  Google Scholar

• Strang, A. J., Haworth, J., Hieronymus, Yard., Walsh, M., & Smart, Fifty. J. (2011). Structural changes in postural sway lend insight into furnishings of balance training, vision, and back up surface on postural control in a healthy population. European Journal of Practical Physiology, 111(seven), 1485–1495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1770-6.

• Titchener, Eastward. B. (1899). Structural and functional psychology. Philosophical Review, 8, 290–299. https://doi.org/x.2307/2176244.

  Article  Google Scholar

• Turvey, M. T. (2019). Lectures on perception: An ecological perspective.

• Tye, M. (2000). Consciousness, colour, and content (vol. 113). MIT Press.

• von Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leopold Voss.

  Google Scholar

• Woodworth, R. S. (1938). Experimental psychology. Holt.

  Google Scholar

• Zahorik, P., & Wightman, F. L. (2001). Loudness constancy with varying sound source distance. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/82931

  Article  Google Scholar

• Zaidi, Q. (1998). Identification of illuminant and object colors: heuristic-based algorithms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 15, 1767–1776.

  Google Scholar

• Zaidi, Q. (2002). Colour constancy in a rough world. Color Research & Application, 26(S1), S192–S200.

Download references

Writer information

Affiliations

1. The Brain Institute, Chapman Academy, Orange, CA, USA

   Alessandra Buccella

Corresponding writer

Correspondence to Alessandra Buccella.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most this article

Cite this article

Buccella, A. The trouble of perceptual invariance. Synthese 199, 13883–13905 (2021). https://doi.org/x.1007/s11229-021-03402-2

Download citation

• Received: 23 Nov 2020

• Accustomed: 03 September 2021

• Published: 16 September 2021

• Event Date: December 2021

• DOI : https://doi.org/ten.1007/s11229-021-03402-2

Keywords

• Perception
• Invariance
• Perceptual constancy
• Properties
• Relations

dangarcompearid.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-021-03402-2

Share this post